Girls and philosophy: this book isn't a metaphor for anything

How not to watch Girls / David J. Frost -- Don't get mad at Girls / Rachel Robison-Greene -- Adam, like a hero / Trip McCrossin -- Why Girls can't be spoiled / Richard Greene -- What Girls teaches us about millennials and the meaning of life / Kimberly Blessing and Samantha Wezowiczi -- Jessa the existentialist / Chelsi Barnard Archibald -- Can Hannah rewrite her world? / Hayley Addis -- Can millennials be authentic? / Rachel Crossley -- The q-tipping point of anxiety / Marie van Loon -- Listen, ladies! Or maybe you shouldn't / Roberto Sirvent and Joel Avery -- The seven deadly sins of Girls / James Edwin Mahon and Nicole Kimes Walker -- Vulnerable young workers / Andy Wible -- A tale of two Hannahs / Christopher Ketcham -- Forever unsatisfied / Kenn Fisher -- What their clothes tell us about those girls / Anna Keszeg -- Who are the ladies? / Toni Adleberg -- Suffering for want of love / Zorianna Zurba -- Were we educated for this? / David LaRocca -- Chinese philosophy looks at Girls / Bobby Carleo and Paul D'Ambrosio.;The drama-comedy show Girls -- often under-rated by being perceived as Sex and the City for the Millennial generation -- has made TV history and provoked controversy for its pitilessly accurate portrayal of four oddly sympathetic twenty-something female characters, notable for their self-absorption, empathy deficits, and ineptitude with relationships. Among other breakthroughs, it is the first show to depict the sex act among the alienated young as nearly always awkward and unfulfilling. In Girls and Philosophy, a team of diverse yet always sensitive, empathic, and ept philosophers approach the world of Girls from a variety of angles and philosophical points of view.